In one of the tightest elections in the United Kingdom, the Conservative Party emerged victorious with a highly unexpected majority win, allowing the party to govern without a need for a coalition or alliance with other parties. The outright win clears all the uncertainties of a political stalemate but refocuses attention on the following two concerns:

  • The United Kingdom’s European Union (EU) membership “In-and-Out” referendum (or vote)
  • A possible repeat of the Scottish independence “yes-or-no” referendum.

Firstly, while the re-election of the Conservative Party into office means policy continuity, the risk is the materialization of Prime Minister and Party leader David Cameron’s pre-election promise to allow the EU “In-or-Out” referendum (“Brexit”) by 2017. Underlining our concern, Societe Generale SA (Bloomberg report, May 6th), highlighted that a Brexit is the “biggest risk to the (UK) economy”, threatening to knock 0.5% a year off economic growth.

Secondly, the Scottish National Party’s landslide win in Scotland with a sweep of almost all the seats (56 out of 59), renews the question of a breakup of the United Kingdom if Scotland orchestrates a second independence attempt. Last September, Scottish voters narrowly rejected independence with a mere 5.3% tipping the scale to the “No” camp. In return for keeping Scotland in the United Kingdom, Prime Minister David Cameron promised to “transfer” more taxation and spending powers to the Scottish Parliament. More concessions would have to be made in favour of the Scots.

Looking beyond the domestic unity issue, we believe that the second-term parliament would continue to demonstrate economic common sense. The importance and advantages of direct access to a common trading market, which is also the world’s 2nd largest market after the United States, cannot be ignored by rational voters. The “In-or-Out” referendum is inevitable and it is all up to the negotiation skills of Prime Minister David Cameron to wrangle more constructive economic and even political changes from the EU. With the threat of another country potentially quitting the EU (besides Greece), the EU has more incentive (and stress) to consider changes or incorporate more flexibility in its “one-size-fits-all” rules and regulations.

We deem Brexit, a threat to the viability of the EU (and also European Monetary Union – countries that use euro), as a low possibility. Despite the potential removal of a stress factor on the euro, we expect euro to trade weaker as the European Central Bank continues its asset purchase program.

© Jachin Capital Pte Ltd

UEN: 201419754M

The contents of this document are for information only and is taken or compiled from sources that we, Jachin Capital Pte Ltd, believe to be reliable. To the maximum extent permitted by law, we do not make any representation or warranty (express or implied) that this information is accurate, timely or complete and it should not be relied upon as such. Opinions expressed are our current opinions as at the date of this document only and are subject to change without notice. We endeavour to update on a reasonable basis the information discussed but regulatory, compliance or other reasons may prevent us from doing so. The publication and distribution of this document is not and does not imply any form of endorsement of any person, entity, service or product described or appearing here. This is not and does not constitute or form an offer to buy or sell nor the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security or financial instrument nor to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. We are not soliciting any action based on this document. The information, services and products described or appearing here are intended only for Accredited Investors (as currently defined in the Securities and Futures Act) and are not intended for nor targeted at the public in any specific jurisdiction. This information does not take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations or needs of individual investors. Investors should seek independent financial, tax or legal advice or make independent investigations as considered necessary or appropriate before making an investment decision. Investments involve risk. Any past performance, projection, forecast or simulation of results is not necessarily indicative of the future or likely performance of any investment instrument.

Essential SSL